SaaS company builds AI risk framework before Series B
Investors required documented AI risk management. Built comprehensive risk framework aligned with NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act in 5 weeks.
Independent conformity assessments that reduce regulatory exposure, limit liability, and give regulators, clients, and investors the evidence they need to trust your AI.
An independent conformity assessment that evaluates whether your AI systems meet the obligations established by the EU AI Act.
An EU AI Act Audit is conducted against the requirements of the regulation, covering risk classification, technical documentation, data governance, human oversight mechanisms, transparency obligations, and post-market monitoring. It independently verifies whether your AI systems meet the conformity requirements applicable to their risk category, and delivers a structured audit report you can present to regulators, notified bodies, clients, and investors as evidence that your AI systems have been assessed against the regulation.
Audit evidence satisfies the conformity requirements of the EU AI Act and other applicable frameworks. Externally verified, not self-declared.
An audit identifies compliance gaps before regulators do. That difference matters when EU AI Act penalties of up to 3% of global turnover are on the table.
Regulated industries require evidence of AI governance before signing contracts. An accredited audit report removes that barrier.
An independent audit gives boards and investors a credible, structured view of how your AI systems are governed and controlled under the regulation.
Audit findings reveal where compliance documentation disconnects from actual system behavior. That gap is where liability sits.
If a regulator or notified body asks how your AI was assessed, an accredited third-party audit is the answer that holds.
Classify AI systems under the EU AI Act risk taxonomy (unacceptable, high-risk, limited risk, minimal risk). Define the audit boundary and applicable conformity requirements for each system in scope.
Assess technical documentation, risk management records, data governance policies, transparency obligations, and conformity assessment documentation against EU AI Act requirements.
Evaluate implementation of human oversight mechanisms, data governance controls, monitoring processes, and incident response procedures through interviews and evidence review.
Evaluate model behavior against EU AI Act requirements for accuracy, robustness, and non-discrimination. Assess testing methodology and performance documentation.
Identify and classify findings against EU AI Act obligations. Distinguish between gaps in documentation, gaps in implementation, and gaps in operational effectiveness.
Deliver a structured audit report with findings mapped to EU AI Act articles, root cause analysis, and a prioritized remediation roadmap aligned with conformity requirements.
We operate as an accredited, independent assurance body, delivering certifications and audits that regulators, investors, and boards trust.
Accredited as Conformity Assessment Body for AI Management Systems by ANAB (United States) and in the process for UKAS (United Kingdom) and ENAC (Spain - EU).
Our team is qualified by leading international organisations for training and certification in AI, data and privacy governance.
Member of IAPP, INCITS, UKAI and signatory to the EU AI Pact.
Investors required documented AI risk management. Built comprehensive risk framework aligned with NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act in 5 weeks.
An independent conformity assessment that evaluates whether your AI systems meet the obligations established by the EU AI Act. The output is a structured audit report you can present to regulators, notified bodies, clients, and investors.
Any organization that develops, deploys, or distributes AI systems in the European Union, regardless of where it is headquartered. The regulation applies to providers, deployers, importers, and distributors of AI systems placed on the EU market.
Risk classification, technical documentation, data governance, human oversight mechanisms, transparency obligations, accuracy and robustness testing, and post-market monitoring. The audit evaluates whether controls are operative, not just documented.
For high-risk AI systems, the EU AI Act requires a conformity assessment before market placement. Depending on the system category, third-party involvement from a notified body may be required. An independent audit by an accredited body provides the evidence base that conformity assessments rely on.
Penalties reach up to 3% of global annual turnover for violations of obligations, and up to 6% for prohibited AI practices. For SMEs and startups, lower caps apply. An independent audit is the most effective way to identify and close compliance gaps before penalties are imposed.
A single system audit typically takes between four and six weeks from scoping to report delivery. Multi-system or multi-jurisdiction engagements take longer depending on complexity and documentation readiness.
Accreditation means the body has been independently evaluated for technical competence and impartiality by a recognized accreditation body. An audit report from an accredited body carries evidentiary weight with regulators and notified bodies that unaccredited assessments do not.
Our team is ready to support your compliance, cybersecurity, and privacy needs. Complete the contact form or reach out to [email protected], and our experts will guide you through the next steps.