SaaS company builds AI risk framework before Series B
Investors required documented AI risk management. Built comprehensive risk framework aligned with NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act in 5 weeks.
Independent conformity assessments aligned with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework that reduce regulatory exposure, limit liability, and give regulators, clients, and investors the evidence they need to trust your AI.
A NIST AI RMF Audit is an independent assessment that evaluates whether your AI systems are governed in alignment with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, turning risk exposure into structured, auditable evidence.
A NIST AI RMF Audit is conducted against the four core functions of the framework: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage. It evaluates whether your organization has established the governance structures, risk identification processes, measurement mechanisms, and operational controls required to manage AI risk responsibly. The audit independently verifies whether those structures are operative, not just documented.
Audit evidence satisfies NIST AI RMF alignment requirements for federal procurement and contractor qualification. Externally verified, not self-declared.
An audit identifies governance gaps before regulators, procurement teams, or legal counterparties do. That difference matters when contracts, licenses, or liability are on the table.
Large US corporations and regulated industries require evidence of AI risk management before signing contracts. An accredited audit report removes that barrier.
An independent audit gives boards and investors a credible, structured view of how your AI systems are governed and controlled against the primary US AI governance standard.
Audit findings reveal where governance documentation disconnects from actual system behavior across the Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage functions. That gap is where liability sits.
If a regulator, federal agency, or client asks how your AI risk is managed, an accredited third-party audit aligned with NIST AI RMF is the answer that holds.
Define the audit boundary, the AI systems in scope, their intended use, and the applicable NIST AI RMF profile. Identify relevant sector-specific guidance and regulatory context.
Assess organizational governance structures, AI risk policies, accountability frameworks, and oversight mechanisms against the Govern function requirements of the NIST AI RMF.
Evaluate risk identification processes, impact assessments, AI system categorization, and measurement mechanisms. Assess whether risks are identified, analyzed, and tracked with adequate rigor.
Evaluate implementation of risk treatment controls, monitoring processes, incident response procedures, and operational governance through interviews and evidence review.
Identify and classify findings against NIST AI RMF core functions and subcategories. Distinguish between gaps in documentation, gaps in implementation, and gaps in operational effectiveness.
Deliver a structured audit report with findings mapped to NIST AI RMF functions and subcategories, root cause analysis, and a prioritized remediation roadmap.
We operate as an accredited, independent assurance body, delivering certifications and audits that regulators, investors, and boards trust.
Accredited as Conformity Assessment Body for AI Management Systems by ANAB (United States) and in the process for UKAS (United Kingdom) and ENAC (Spain - EU).
Our team is qualified by leading international organisations for training and certification in AI, data and privacy governance.
Member of IAPP, INCITS, UKAI and signatory to the EU AI Pact.
Investors required documented AI risk management. Built comprehensive risk framework aligned with NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act in 5 weeks.
An independent assessment that evaluates whether your AI systems are governed in alignment with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. The output is a structured audit report you can present to federal agencies, enterprise clients, investors, and regulators.
Any organization developing or deploying AI systems in the US market, particularly those selling to federal agencies, operating in regulated sectors, or subject to enterprise procurement requirements that include AI governance criteria.
The four core functions of the framework: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage. The audit evaluates whether governance structures, risk identification processes, measurement mechanisms, and operational controls are operative, not just documented.
NIST AI RMF is a voluntary framework, but alignment is increasingly required by federal procurement rules, state-level AI regulations, and enterprise clients. For organizations selling to the US federal government or operating in regulated sectors, independent alignment evidence is effectively mandatory.
Both frameworks address AI risk governance but from different regulatory angles. NIST AI RMF is the primary US reference; the EU AI Act is binding regulation in Europe. Organizations operating across both jurisdictions benefit from an audit that addresses both frameworks simultaneously. Zertia's accreditation covers both.
A single system audit typically takes between four and six weeks from scoping to report delivery. Complexity, number of systems, and documentation readiness affect the timeline.
Accreditation means the body has been independently evaluated for technical competence and impartiality. An audit report from an ANAB-accredited body carries weight with federal agencies, enterprise procurement teams, and investors that unaccredited assessments do not.
Yes. NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 share significant structural overlap. An audit aligned with NIST AI RMF builds the governance foundation and evidence base that accelerates ISO 42001 certification readiness.
Our team is ready to support your compliance, cybersecurity, and privacy needs. Complete the contact form or reach out to [email protected], and our experts will guide you through the next steps.